COPA vs Craig Wright Case: BTC and BSV's Future
Summary:
1. Craig Wright wrote Bitcoin White Paper.
2. BTC lost the originality of the Bitcoin protocol due to the introduction of Segwit in 2017.
3. BSV restored all the damaged Bitcoin protocols in the meantime, taking an unrivaled position as the original Bitcoin in both name and reality.
4. BSV is Turing Complete, so smart contracting is possible. In fact, it’s the best, not to the extent possible.
5. BSV pursues an unbound block size, so unlimited scalability is possible.
6. Therefore, BSV can be integrated with Ipv6, which will enable Web3, and if this is realized, it will be at the center of the historical event of Internet and blockchain integration.
7. Craig Wright’s identity as a Bitcoin creator will be demonstrated in the COPA vs Craig Wright Trial, scheduled for mid-January 2024.
8. If you draw it, it is highly likely that Craig Wright will be copyrighted for white papers, databases and file formats in the Copyright lawsuit scheduled for later. This is because it is natural for the author to have copyright.
9. Then, as the false identity of BTC, which is leading to Bitcoin, is revealed, BTC will no longer be called Bitcoin.
10. However, it is not possible to predict that BSV will replace BTC or that price reversal will occur immediately.
11. This is because the false narrative they have built is firm and the power of interest groups to protect it is powerful.
12. Even so, it is true that this process can be a new starting point.
ipv6
You just have to spend a bit of time reading the white paper to see that BTC is no longer in line with what was described in the white paper especially around the section referring to incentives where miners rewards will be ultimately reliant on transaction fees only…BTC is no where near that ability. Lets go BSV 2024.
This never makes any sense when they explain it… why did they need to break Bitcoin in the first place, only to claim that they broke it so that they could fix it again? There is obviously something very shady that happened back then. If the original Craig Wright protocol of BSV from 2009 was scalable and supported smart contracts, then why the hell was that removed ? and then why was the excuse put forth that they needed to have Ethereum and later 2's to make a scalable blockchain, and have Bitcoin be only digital gold because it could not scaleor support smart contracts ??? Obviously this is a den of dastardly deeds from start to finish.
❤💯❤💯❤💯❤