Intel have just made their BIGGEST MISTAKE yet

19 thoughts on “Intel have just made their BIGGEST MISTAKE yet”

• Buy ARM, sell INTC

• The biggest obstacle to ARM chips succeeding is Windows on ARM. Idk what state its in currently but if Qualcomm want to get serious then MS need to get WinARM right. Then theres also the sheer number of companies which could develop ARM CPUs and the only 2 that have an x86 licence. Like others here I agree there might be compatiblity issues which might steer people away from ARM intially. We will see how AMD competes with this when they release their APUs in laptop next year (though the fact we have ths now and AMD isn't launching or even announcing yet is concerning. They also haven't been shy about thinking about ARM. Nvidia are rumoured to be developing their own too as you said.

  Bottom line: I am quite worried about Intel as a CPU making business.

• I read that INTEL will soon change into the new architecture of CPU's and Chips manufacturing. The 14'th gen was the last INTEL Processor with this kind of architecture. The next one, the 15'th gen CPU will be made with all new INTEL Chips and CUP's architecture and it will be a game changing for everything it will have more AI and less watt consuming. INTEL will beat all, in Chip and Processor manufacturing next year. We have to wait and see until the next generation of INTEL CPU and Chips come out.

• Apple is "flexible and connected"? Connected, 100%, but flexible? o_O

• So how many years do we have to we have to hear about this??? X86 isn't going anywhere until someone comes up with a code base that is backward compatible (without performance loss). This lovely idea has been roaming the halls of peoples biases since the early 2000's.

• Your comment about Apple M-processors being excellent and still dissing Apple as a company for other very valid reasons shows that you are able to make a very balanced analysis. Very rare these days!

• As I have predicted about a decade ago ARM based RISC chips will be the future for the personal computer/client space and eventually also for enterprise. x86 chips will continue to be legacy, business critical platforms and still relevant for very long time also for personal computer users. What would be I think a smart move from the Intel and AMD is to create first hybrid x86 + ARM based CPUs/SOCs to give users flexibility they need with the x86 & ARM based apps or when need to run their machines in high power x86 mode vs low power ARM efficient mode. Of course Windows would need to be completely revamped and innovated with ability to switch between these modes with one dynamic or multiple kernels. I think this would be the right transition moving forward if executed correctly as x86 carries a HUGE history and legacy behind it through backwards compatibility.

• If games work well on ARM chips, they'll definitely be a thread to Intel

  Get it?…

• Qualcomm have stagnated so hard, if they managed to keep up their perfomance gains and make a more sensible naming scheme they could have been ahead of x64 by now, but after the 888 they slowed down, the XR2 is so old now, there was such a big gap. so i didn't stay on the flagship train, i went down to a 600 series and i don't regret it.

• When ARM has highly optimized libraries using NEON more efficiently maybe x86 is out of luck. The amount of libraries highly optimized on x86 is a stumbling block for ARM that will buy it several more years … really maturing a neuromorphic structure is going to be more of a game changer

• Smoking truly makes voice go bad

• I think being able to use an arm-based CPU with x86 emulation under Windows core OS it would be really interesting to see without necessarily having x86 attached to the OS.

• It's a tremendous race to create the most powerful ARM CPU that's compatible with….nothing. Good luck with that.

• With regards to Apple's performance figures, my guess would be that they're certainly using SPEC and taking the median of the performance improvements they get in all subtests. They might be throwing Geekbench in the mix too. When you translate the marketing speak, you will see that in the keynote they separately talked about both the low-level improvements via synthetic benchmarks (the opaque "10% faster, 30% faster" claims) and improvements they get in apps at the OS level (saying the M3 is 40% faster in "Image filters and effects performance" or 2x faster "for scene rendering in Cinema4D"). It's not perfect, but trying to explain to the average consumer that te M3 Pro's memory bandwidth is 150GB/s and how that will affect performance compared to M3 Max which has 400GB/s would probably be a pointless exercise as well, so they just spice the marketing up instead. Personally I think Apple's performance figures generally match the actual performance about as well as marketing figures you get from Intel or AMD or any other company.

• This SHOULD give microsoft another door into the mobile OS market as well if they play their cards right.

• Don't bet against Intel.

• I think I remember hearing something about an Intel roadmap that was going towards their chips not only being x86/x64 but ALSO ARM TOO… like all in one chip it could run both architectures but this is a ways off…. like in 2028…. I could be wrong and remembering something totally differently

• Personally, I would take Apple’s performance gains with a large dose of salt. They’ve proven exaggerated in the past.

• hey Corteks, you MIGHT wanna talk with URCDKeys about their 'mid-year' sale being a little late… or maybe you could just fix the audio to say something else, like 'holiday sale' or something kike that 👍

Comments are closed.