NETWORK ADMINISTRATIONSWindows server

Windows Server vs Client

In this video I compare each version of Windows Server with it’s client counterpart. I skip Windows Server 2012 R1 and Windows Server 2019 because Windows Server 2012 R1 is too similar to Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2019 is too similar to Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server 2022.

00:00 – Windows Server 2003 vs Windows XP
04:32 – Windows Server 2008 vs Windows Vista
09:43 – Windows Server 2008 R2 vs Windows 7
14:25 – Windows Server 2012 R2 vs Windows 8.1
21:47 – Windows Server 2016 vs Windows 10 1607
26:00 – Windows Server 2022 vs Windows 10 21H2

Voice: Murf – Ethan
Script: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jYTWN1OqHgrT5u79ByqHV-F36FtDNY_N/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111432791097633432051&rtpof=true&sd=true

source

windows server

Alice AUSTIN

Alice AUSTIN is studying Cisco Systems Engineering. He has passion with both hardware and software and writes articles and reviews for many IT websites.

20 thoughts on “Windows Server vs Client

  • wait so we should use windows server instead of regular windows? (I said instead of regular windows, ofc linux is still clear winner)

  • The TTS makes this incredibly hard to watch.

  • The windows server 2008 having thumbnails off by default thing is the most bizarre choice in the whole video

  • I like how you used old GameMaker in the video.
    Nostalgia. ❤️

  • Windows Server (2003 at least) does have the visual themes included, however the service comes disabled by default. One must enable it manually on Services in order to access Luna (and maybe Windows Basic/Aero).

  • Windows Server (2003 at least) does have the visual themes included, however the service comes disabled by default. One must enable it manually on Services in order to access Luna (and maybe Windows Basic/Aero).

  • Where is Windows NT 4, Windows 2000 and Windows 8/Windows Server 2012?
    Windows 2000 was the best.

  • I remember compiling Windows Server 2003 from scratch. Such good days…

  • Some facts:
    1. Windows Server 2003/R2's kernel version is NT 5.2, whereas XP x86 is NT 5.1, i.e. there was no production release for server builds ever with NT 5.1. XP Professional x64 is NT 5.2, same build as Server 2003. (Not even mentioning there are 2 editions of IA-64 builds of XP, one NT 5.1 and other NT 5.2; both of them are long obsolete.)
    2. If you go one generation back, it would be Windows 2000 Server (NT 5.0) as server OS, Windows 2000 Professional (NT 5.0) and Windows Me (4.9, 9x/MS-DOS 8.0) as clients.

  • BREAKING NEWS: WINDOWS 10 IS GETTING UNSUPORTED ON 2025 OCTOBER SO I RECOMEND THIS:

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦

    Windows 11

  • We noted That in the past The Windows client versions were released first and then the server versions were released After Windows client versions , but today this has changed now the servers are released first and the Windows client versions are created later

  • 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • It seems that usability, performance and efficiency start to decline after 2003. LOL I think the user interface in Windows 7 is at its best. It's all downhill after that. Server 2003, Active Directory, Exchange, IIS, networking services ran on a machine with less than 512MB of memory. That's some good programming.

  • 9:13 Windows Vista in Virtualbox has gone black screen when I turned 3D Acceleration on… 😢

  • Did you forget to add windows 11

  • Imagine your keyboard stopped automatically in windows server and u have to shutdown and u have to type the comment that sounds painful

Comments are closed.